Langsung ke konten utama

Challengers is humanistically challenging me

People say Challengers is one of those films you’ll regret not seeing in theaters and I confirm that’s true. I regret I didn’t join Challengers summer back in 2024.

 

First impression

I had access to subscribe Prime Video for three days. As I scrolled through the app, Challengers popped up on home page. I added this movie to my watch list because why not? It turned out to be the best decision! Challengers became my favorite movie to watch on this streaming service.

All I knew about this movie is 2T: tennis and threesome. I didn’t look up for the crew and cast, but I can tell the cinematography is Call Me by Your Name (2017) vibes. Later, I found out the filmmakers are the same people who worked on that movie, director Luca Guadagnino and cinematographer Sayombhu Mukdeeprom. The screenplay was written by Justin Kuritzkes, who—fun fact—is married to Celine Song, Past Lives (2023) director. I can’t keep my focus on how cute Art was, I didn’t realize the actor was Mike, my Shayla from West Side Story (2021). All the familiar things made so much sense!

 

My favorite intoxicating trio

Zendaya, Mike Faist, and Josh O’Connor are the trio I never knew I needed. Their threesome kiss is the craziest kissing scene I’ve seen in movies. It was beautifully filmed. Luca really has the sexiest idea to shoot a sexy film without a sex scene. The threesome kiss isn’t scripted, it’s improvised, making it even sexier.

In an interview with Fandango, Zendaya said she loves the kiss scene because we see the characters’ enjoyment. They were teenagers, shit hasn’t happened yet, they didn’t try to hurt each other.

Challengers argue the literal meaning of love triangle. It’s not two guys chase one girl, but three crazy-ass bitches who fuck up with each other. If one more thing enters their relationship and turns it into foursome, it’ll be tennis. Some argue that Tashi is the tennis ball served between Art and Patrick. I mean Challengers isn’t really about tennis, isn’t it? This movie uses tennis as a metaphor. As Luca explained, tennis is an objective sport, but he wanted to make it subjective here.

 

Patrick and Art, the bisexual icons

I’d like to argue that Patrick and Art have more chemistry with each other than either of them has with Tashi. I mean from the name itself, you can’t spell Patrick without Art. From Art’s perspective on his sad marriage with Tashi, I can tell “Good Luck, Babe!” by Chappell Roan is a song that’s stuck in Patrick’s head.

The improvised churros scene makes the chemistry between Patrick and Art stronger. The script never specifies how they were supposed to eat churros. Josh was just hungry. Then again, Luca had this sexy idea to show churros as a penis symbol. The way Patrick is looking for Art before looking for his own girlfriend, the way he pulls Art’s chair so they sit closer, and the way they share churros excitedly... Are you sure that’s not gay? [insert a dog meme with “I know what you are” caption in it]

 

Tashi, their homewrecker

From the start, Patrick objectifies Tashi as a hot woman, he’s a horny womanizer. On the other hand, Art admires her as a remarkable young woman and a talented tennis player.

The film’s tagline “her game, her rules” fits perfectly. When Tashi begins playing with Patrick and Art, she switches her focus from giving attention to one of them, and lets the other one feel left out. She does the same thing to both guys. Ever since Tashi plays a game with her little white boys, she becomes a homewrecker of their homoerotic friendship.

People refer to Patrick and Art as fire and ice. What’s meant by fire is not only in his style of playing tennis, but also implies that Patrick is man with ego. Each time Tashi pays attention to Art, his facial expression falls into disappointment. Or... Does he feel ignored by Art?

Art is codependent based on who he is with, he mirrors the person he’s with. When he’s with Patrick, he smokes like Patrick. When he’s with Tashi, he pressures himself to play tennis because tennis is the love of her life. In tennis, Art is arguably the least talented player of all three. In codependency, Art is the one who tends to fall.

 

To whom do they put their love?

To make it clear: Patrick loves Art, Art loves Tashi, and Tashi loves tennis. Patrick is the first person who taught Art how to jerk off, hence why he uses sex to manipulate Art. Patrick not only hooks up with Tashi, but he also uses it as an excuse to put down Art. It creates insecurity for Art.

Art and Patrick say the same sentence to Tashi, “It’s gonna make you angry.” But they deliver it in different ways. Art says it quietly, fear of being unloved. Patrick says it casually, almost like teasing. This happens because Art views Tashi as a God-like figure and worships her as if she’s Jesus. Patrick—in contrast—sees Tashi as a human being with flaws. He sees her as a human first, tennis player second—while Art does the exact opposite.

Going back to the first sentence on this topic. Zendaya said in an interview with IMDb that tennis is everything for Tashi, hence why her commitment is strong. Tashi loves tennis more than anything. Even when she’s married with a daughter, she still feels like a gifted kid burnout who’s haunted by the dream of becoming the greatest tennis player. Does Tashi know that Taylor Swift wrote a song for her called “this is me trying”?

Tashi has a different background from Art and Patrick. She has no other option, she wants to be great or nothing. When she gets injured, she just accepts it and moves on. Deep down, she’s never really healed from that wound. She then projected the burden onto her partner, demanding him to achieve her unachieved dream.

Let me quote this from a Challengers review on Medium: Her character reminded me so much of those parents who never got to fulfill their own personal dreams, and then make it their life’s mission to live vicariously through their children. She pushed Art to win Grand Slams because she never got to, and when he wasn’t winning anymore, she gave up on him. I agree with that take because if you don’t have enough satisfaction with yourself, why would you start a family?

Tashi sees Art as a loser. She warns him to please don’t embarrass her just like that Sabrina Carpenter song “Please Please Please”. I want to quote another paragraph from the same review text on Medium: Patrick may have been ranked far lower than Art, but at least Tashi held him in higher regard, and clearly couldn’t stay away from him. I don’t think she respected him, necessarily, but I do think she recognized a similar passion in him that Art was always missing. In the trailer, Patrick says to Art, “It’s nice to see you lit up about something, even if it’s my girlfriend.” I honestly don’t think Art could’ve had the success he did without Tashi constantly pushing him.

           

Technical aspects

The nonlinear plot isn’t confusing at all, it effectively works for the storytelling development. At first, I have no idea who the characters are and what they’ve been up to. Then, I’m invested in this drama. From one opened layer to another, it’s interesting to see three people who never really get over each other.

Despite its eye-pleasing visuals, another thing I’d give credit for is the camera angle that depicts a triangle. When they’re happy together, they’re in the same frame, and their positions look like a triangle. As the tension is tensioning, the screen splits, focusing on each other’s faces. The scoring by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross supports this tension of intimacy and rivalry. Also, I want to give credit to the makeup and hairdo team. They make the characters look convincing from their teenage looks to their adult looks.

 

Humanity, defined by movies (including this one)

As I grow older, I begin to realize that my favorite movie genre is the one with complicated characters and explores the complexity of human life. Maybe I just have this Gen Z in me because they say Gen Z is an “embracing relatability” generation.

A typical hero main character seems irrelevant to me. Yeah they’re cool and everything, so what? What if I find myself never being like that cool-ass character, instead of feeling inspired? I prefer the anti-hero main character who’s as messy as me, as proof that I feel seen, that people like me actually exist—even if it’s only validated in fiction.

Challengers is an example of this. Some people are siding with one character and villainizing the others. But honestly, maturing is realizing three of them are all the same, they’re fucked in the head! And I hate that somehow, I can see myself in each of them. What a sick way to say, “They're just like me fr.” Zendaya even said, “The challenge with a character is not necessarily justifying their actions, but always making them feel human enough to empathize with their decisions.”

That’s why I never really leave hard feelings against people, I mean we’re just humans after all. To understand humans is to grow empathy. Humans are THAT difficult to understand, and I’m a part of humans. I’m not trying to associate this with some sort of philosophical level, but I guess this is what they call humanity.

 

What’s the ending is really about?

At the end of the film, they’ve found each other. Patrick comes back to Art, Art gives what Tashi craves, and Tashi watches some good fucking tennis. COME ON! The winner isn’t being announced because it doesn’t really matter. What matters is they got their own version of a happy ending. The ending is open to interpretation. It could be ambiguous, perhaps they go back to the hotel room.

I agree with Josh. He said, “They’ve been all searching for a way and getting it terribly wrong, searching for a way to satisfy that need, that hunger for each other. And they’re all trying to find their way in different ways. For Art, maybe it’s getting out of tennis and being with the family, reconnecting with his wife. For Tashi, it’s finding that satisfaction in tennis that she lost by having her career stunted. For Patrick, it’s also finding that feeling of flow when he was playing tennis with Art as a youngster, or watching Tashi playing tennis as a youngster.”

 

This film leaves an impressive impression on me. The acting is on point, the scenes are sensual, and the soundtrack is killing it. The view is incredible, I wish I could see it on IMAX. At its core, this film is about humanity: humanizing humans in their messiest form. A solid 8/10 from me.

 

References:

Screenshots from Letterboxd

Pictures from Pinterest

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Challengers_(film)

https://youtu.be/QRKYU7dHy4U?si=L8dGUOmoTFyi-Fqv

https://youtu.be/cWqWucj3k2I?si=0gzTec3PPNUeSixY

https://boxd.it/6muVCH

https://youtu.be/MO1NGHaWQFU?si=c89T_pBltznDSxbr

https://medium.com/its-only-a-movie/challengers-review-another-serve-from-zendaya-and-luca-guadagnino-98b5970547dc

https://youtu.be/-qltCHwMZZ8?si=YkRCFCx24v76U-md

https://ew.com/challengers-ending-explained-luca-guadagnino-zendaya-mike-faist-josh-o-connor-8639336

Komentar